Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
How much sway case regulation holds may well differ by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances in the current case. To discover this concept, look at the following case law definition.
14. During the light in the position explained previously mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his personal and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the size of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will take care of the many aspects of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the assorted decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation may be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
Are you currently looking for Court Information? You need to use our site to search to get a case or search for a person. Information within the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found to the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or read more reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
Summaries of cases that condition the lives of younger individuals, guaranteeing a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fans alike.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its primary purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more